My ratings are purely based on how I viewed the movie from an entertainment point of view, it's not evalution of how much it cost, how amazingly innovative the special effects were or how the Oscar winning acting were just unmissable, its just simply how much I thought the movie was entertaining.
Harry Potter was dissapointing to me after reading the book, I don't feel the movie did it full justice. It has been sudgested before that these last 2 movies should have been in 2 parts, not practical I know but would have done it more justice perhaps?
Fast & Furious is a good action movie that is very entertaining IN MY OPINION, very exciting on the big screen, agreed its not the most intelligent of movies but is that all they have to be about?
I think a movie should simply entertain, hell thats why most of them made. Not educational, not informative just entertaining. My ratings are based on the entertainment value that I recieved.
Perhaps I'm abnormal? Who knows?