So tonight I am off to watch football with my mates. I think I'm going to AAM, but sensibly.
I'm going to have just one pack at lunchtime, to keep me going, then a low carb low cal meal tonight. We'll all be out, and blokes just don't get VLCD's when I try and explain them.
I have come to the realisation that my VLCD is to lose the weight, and repair my food habits.
When I was on Lighter Life, I did not blip until the last two weeks, when I literally had the occasional slice of ham or cheese.
And I kept the weight off for 6 months, until my depression kicked in.
My point is, I understand the behaviours needed, and now feel able to do it. But whilst I don't want to totally abstain all the time on my VLCD by never choosing to AAM, I believe following the whole 1 week of AAM will make it harder for me to go back to total abstinence.
Whereas, if on special/rare occasions, I AAM, I think I can make it work.
It's trial and error, but this way I reckon I will have roughly 1 meal a fortnight, stay in (or around) ketosis and still lose weight, with less chance of caving and more chance of maintenance afterwards....
Does that make any sense or am I just talking b*ll*cks?
I have read a lot on here, and whilst I think this forum is valuable, there are a few dogmatic posters who think it’s all a black and white issue. I suppose I disagree, in that I think this has to be about making it work for me, for life.
Anyway, still chuffed about last night’s result, and going to aim for 1lb a day on average from here on in. If I do that, I can have a month of getting used to regular meals before Christmas. And be thinner, hotter and happier!