that is the problem though isnt it. There are lots of genuine reasons for people to be on benefits and no one is questioning them, it's the ones that stay on it to milk the system. The likes of the ones that we see constantly in the papers. Benefits should be only for people who need it and are in circumstances like yourself. x
Firstly, lets be clear about some things. The stuff the media feeds us is absolutely designed to get peoples backs up about those on benefits. They pick out extreme cases, where there is a large family or they are particularly workshy, and focus on them and build all the hype up about how lazy they are and how they shouldnt be getting all this money etc, but all it does is build resentment against anyone on any benefits, imply that they are inferior people to those who are working, and builds a far more general impression of lazy slobs cashing in on other people than is really the case.
This benefit cap thing, of £26000, well it is extremely unlikely that anyone outside of the London area will be getting anything like that amount of benefit. That cap includes not only their income support but their housing and council tax benefits, and other benefits as well. It has already been said in the media that this is designed to force the larger unemployed families out of London, because it is seen to be unfair that they can afford to live there when working people cannot. Or, in other words, clearing out the undesirables and filling the streets with people of means. No average working family could afford London rents on a basic salary.
A single person on JSA gets about 60 pounds a week if they are over 25, I think, but dont quote me. This is expected to feed them, pay all of their bills, clothe them, get them to work interviews, and most likely top up their rent by a small amount. Fuel has skyrocketed, food is skyrocketing all the time, £60 a week would go nowhere in terms of even basic survival.
A family, yes, will get more, but they will also get child tax credits (also available to those on low working incomes to top them up). You can argue that they shouldnt be having children they cant afford, but those children did not ask to be born.
I am not trying to paint all benefit claimants as saints, far from it. Of course there are people who take advantage but that is not the fault of their children.
What bothers me more is that there is no real opportunities for those people to go back into work, not only are they ALL being tarred by the same media brushes that paint them as second-rate citizens, but now they will be squeezed to the point where they will break. If you want to force people back into work, there has to be work and employers willing to give them a chance. That isnt happening and is unlikely to do so while the economy declines, and while more and more companies are folding, public services are being cut back and MORE people are ending up having to go cap in hand for a handout from the state.
The worse it gets, the more the children and families will suffer. Their diets will get poorer, their health will get poorer and the way things are going, the mortality rates at younger ages will increase.
What backward steps we are taking in the interests of a quick fix for the economy.
FWIW though, I do think the whole cutting the child benefit for one parent over the threshold but not two slightly under it is ridiculous. It should be done on a household income basis, and not on an individual one.