I can feel a deep and meaningful philosophical post coming on...
When is a calorie not a calorie? I've been doing lots of reading lately (because I'm always doing lots of reading - maybe if I got off my butt more often, it wouldn't be quite so large...).
I won't get too far into this right now, cos I've got more reading to do. But the other day, I read something that really made me think - and I can't help but think that it's almost certainly true.
It doesn't matter what you eat - it matters what you digest.
'Conventional wisdom' (and just about every diet book in the world) would have us believe that if you cut your calorie intake over the course of a week by 3,500 calories, you will shed a pound in weight. Conversely, the idea goes if you eat 3,500 calories more over the course of a week than your body requires, you will gain a pound.
I've even spouted stuff like this here in my diary. I've told other people this stuff too - and quite recently (because I believed it at the time).
But now I'm not so sure. Because 'conventional wisdom' isn't at all scientific. It doesn't even work - anyone who's done a low carb diet and shed weight eating in excess of 2,000 calories a day knows it can't be right. And those people who sit around eating 10,000 calories more a day more than they need - they don't gain 3 pounds a day, do they?
It's going to take a while to get my head around this stuff - but maybe I'll start posting it once I do...
:thinking2: