It is indeed strikingly similar to JUDDD - only a bit more structured in that a woman is recommended to eat no more than 1,800 cals on an up day and no more than 300 cals on a down day.
Yes, I looked at the QOD diet when I was researching JUDDD. Sensible on paper, harder to adhere to though. It's like Juddd without the fun
I should imagine that if you bought the JUDDD book, you'd find alsorts of recommendations that we don't see on the forums. Besides...there is a UD calorie limit, so it's not really a feast day. The UD might seem very generous, but it takes you to about 1200-1400 approx a day.
Most people should have a slow (but healthy
) loss on that.
Of course, if others decide to do their own version on Juddd, then on their head be it.
The QOD diet works out at 1,050 a day. Though the losses would be much better, I could see many people falling off the wagon with it without the benefit of ketosis and being such a low amount of cals a day.
They advise taking specific mineral supplements on the down day - presumably because a lack of these particular minerals would endanger health.
Which may happen on a diet that low in calories, though be aware....it's an American diet, and they advice supplements for anything!
Interestingly they do NOT recommend such a weight loss approach for anyone carrying more than 25lbs surplus.
Probably because it's too low in calories (along with modern day thinking) and someone with a lot of weight to lose usually needs more.
think such an approach would pile on the pounds if there were no lengthy 'normal eating' gap in-between.
I'm not sure it would, but there is a school of thought going around that you should only diet for 6 months, then maintain for the next 6 months.
The QOD version seems to recognise that for a satisfying rate of weight loss calories must be quite stringently limited.
But it doesn't have to be. It all depends on how patient you are.
As for the JUDDDers here - only time will tell. I reckon the first month's losses will be more revealing than those of the first week.
I agree. A number of people plateau at week 3-4. That's why I've always maintained that it must be a comfortable way of eating for it to work. Losing the weight is a bonus. Others do go on to lose more though. I have been following people off and on this diet since Sept 2006. One lady has lost 66lbs so far. Not bad eh
Others have come and gone. You know....like every other diet
I fear that we, as food addicts, will always seek out the option that promises to let us eat 'what we like' - albeit in restricted qualities.
Again, yes I agree. You still need to work through the head stuff to get through it healthily. There is no quick fix. Eating what we like isn't exactly too bad a thing though. That's what most non-diet weightloss books recommend
It depends a bit on your approach to eating what you like
Eeeh, enjoyed that
Thanks for the chance to discuss this