Well I can confirm that she did it.
And didn't sink.
How are the achey legs, Dawniekins?
And I just wanted to say my last little bit on the subject of setting target, and then I'm not going to say any more.
This isn't specifically about Dawnie's target - it's a general comment, that I think applies to anyone / everyone. I'll be saying it to myself when I get there, and would say the same to anyone.
Cos I don't think anyone can really know what anyone else should do. We can offer advice, but with the best will in the world, we can't get inside somebody else's head, or see their body the way they can. I know that we aren't always 100% rational about our own bodies, but that doesn't mean that somebody else should decide for us. And it's a bit dangerous to assume that everybody else functions quite like we do, and give advice on that basis.
So we're always going to have arguments about it, unless we stop advising each other, and just letting people make their own minds up!
But anyway - my last word (probably!) on the subject:
As people have said: anybody can really get to any weight - if they're prepared to be stupid.
I could be a Size Zero - but only if I starved myself and was at death's door.
Nobody's suggesting that anybody should do that, I know. But I think (though it pains me to say it!) Steve is right.
(I'm ignoring the bit about "fluking" and the amount Dawnie has lost in 2 weeks, because that was here Christmas "jelly weight": not "set" yet, so easy on: easy off.)
But he said:
I can't obviously account for every mouthful of Dawn's food intake, but I'd wager it is sufficient, healthy and balanced. The new exercise regime will allow even more intake too!
That's the point, isn't it? It applies to all of us.
If by eating a
healthy quantity of
healthy food, and allowing for the occasional treat - ie following SW
to the letter - neither being more rigorous, nor more relaxed than the plan expects -
if more weight comes off - then that's great, and it means that a lower weight can be reached healthily.
If, in order to achieve a lower weight, we need to cut down, then maybe we're at our ideal weight.
And if somebody has reached this point in their weight loss (the "would I need to diet more drastically to get more off?" point) and they're STILL not happy with how they look - then I would question whether they're ever going to be happy with anything that can be achieved by weight loss alone. Beyond that, there's the toning that can be achieved by exercise (which might achieve further weight loss - though it could actually result in weight GAIN, but a better body shape).
And beyond THAT, there's surgery. (Which most of us wouldn't advise, but some people do choose, and again that's their prerogative.)
As I said at the top, this isn't aimed at Dawn. It's universal. There are things inside our heads that affect what we see when we look in the mirror, so we have to try to step away and be completely rational.
Can I lose more weight by following the plan and not doing anything drastic? Yes? Great. Go for it.
Otherwise, (and this is for me, but if it applies to anybody else too, they're welcome to my musings) maybe I just have to accept that, at 45, after a child, nothing is going to make my body look like it did when I was 17. Nothing. Not even surgery, or strenuous exercise. It can look good - it can look a heck of a lot better than it does now. But if I'm waiting for my body to look like the ones I see in magazines, I'm NEVER going to be happy with it!
Sorry, Dawnie - this wasn't aimed at you.
It was just an attempt to move away from people's opinions on other people's weight loss, and where they should set their targets, and whether they should re-set them...
Nobody's opinion is necessarily better than anybody else's, so we need objective rules.
Here ends the sermon. Sorry for taking up so much fred space.